Risk/Crisis Communication

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Ethics smethics

The chapter on ethics doesn't have much else to say other than "ethics are important." But ultimately, we face an ontological crisis; without transcendent moral referents, without even the possibility of agreeing upon a universal ethical structure that applies to everybody everywhere always, ethics, morals, and all related decisions ultimately become existential. Which is to say, personal self-interest constrained only by individual utilitarianism. Bellah said as much in "Habits of the Heart," and Sarte and Camus noted the absence of ethics in much of their work. In other words, the question remains "Why communicate risk?" The answer is ultimately subjective and therefore meaningless.

2 Comments:

  • Which chapter? Which book?

    By Blogger nyuspike, at 1:47 PM  

  • Bellah et al, 1985, Habits of the Heart

    Camus, The Plague & The Stranger (It's been a while since I read these, so I'll have to go back). Sartre, Being and Nothingness and his extended discussion of solipsism. Both Camus and Sarte identified nihilism, and although they withdrew from ultimate meaninglessness their response was subjective. A nice discussion is contained in The Universe Next Door, the chapter on existentialism.

    Sorry I don't have the chapters memorized, but I probably should cite the exact reference next time

    By Blogger Wes Jamison, at 9:54 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home